🔗 Share this article

SCertain encounters seem out of place. Maybe it’s just about conceivable that, had things gone a bit differently in the 1970s, Terry Venables could have been leading their team behind the Soviet Bloc for a shot against Valeriy Lobanovskyi’s tactical masterminds, but Dynamo Kyiv against Crystal Palace is still a fixture that elicits a double-take. It feels like a category error: how can those teams even be in the identical competition?

However this is the contemporary era. The nation is fighting conflict, its teams weakened. The Premier League is incredibly wealthy. And the Eagles are managed by one of the rising stars of the continental football. They didn’t just play each other on Thursday, but they won with a degree of comfort. It was their third straight victory, their 19th consecutive match without loss.

Managerial Rumors and Next Steps

Therefore, because no team of their stature can even just be allowed to enjoy a winning streak, all the discussion is of which club Oliver Glasner could go next. His contract expires at the end of the season and he has refused to agree to an extension. He is fifty-one; if he is planning to lead a top club with the possibility of an extended tenure in command, he doesn’t have a great deal of time to make a transition. Could he then be the answer for the Red Devils? He indeed, after all, play the identical 3-4-2-1 as Ruben Amorim, just rather more effectively.

Tactical Formation and Cultural Background

This raises the issue of why a system that has attracted so much doubt at Old Trafford works so effectively at Palace. But it’s never only about the formation, nor is it the situation – generally speaking – that one formation is inherently superior than another. Rather specific tactical shapes, in conjunction with the style they are enacted, emphasize particular elements of play. It is, at the very least, fascinating that since Harry Catterick’s Everton won the championship in the 1962-63 season with a W-M formation, just a single team has won the Premier League using with a back three: Antonio Conte’s Blues in the 2016-17 season.

Antonio Conte’s Chelsea clinched the championship in 2016-17 with a back three and effectively two attacking midfielders.

Even that was a bit of a rare occurrence. The London club that season had no continental commitments, keeping them fresher than their competitors, and they had players who suited the formation virtually freakishly perfectly.

N’Golo Kanté, with his stamina and reading of the play, is almost a duo in one, and he was operating at the base of midfield alongside either calming presence of Cesc Fàbregas or Nemanja Matic, one of the most incisive playmakers the Premier League has known. That offered the foundation for the dual playmakers: Eden Hazard, who revelled in his unrestricted position, and the Spanish forward, a expert of the run into the box. Every one of those players was improved by their combination with the others.

Systemic Factors and Strategic Difficulties

To an extent, the relative absence of titles for the back three, at least in terms of winning championships, is systemic. Few teams have secured the league using a back three because few clubs have adopted a back three. The World Cup victory in the 1960s cemented in the national mindset the effectiveness of zonal marking with a four defenders.

That stayed the default, nearly without challenge, for the two decades that ensued. But there may also be particular strategic explanations. A three-man backline gets its breadth from the wingbacks; it could be that the intense hard-running style of the English football makes the requirement on those players excessive to be maintained regularly.

However the 3-4-2-1 poses specific difficulties. It is solid, providing the trapezoid structure – three center-backs protected by defensive midfielders – that is widely recognised as the most effective way to defend against rival counterattacks. But that is only one aspect of the match. If they push forward from the protection of the three centre‑backs, given the prevalence of formations with a midfield triangle, two central midfielders will tend to be outmanned without support from elsewhere – unless one of them has the outstanding abilities of the French dynamo.

The striker rejoices after netting his team’s second strike against the Ukrainian side.

Advantages and Weaknesses of the Approach

The very solidity of that tight defensive block, meanwhile, although an advantage for a team aiming to withstand pressure, turns into a possible disadvantage for a side that aim to go on the offensive to the opposition. Its greatest strength is also its primary weakness. The blockish structure of the system, the way the center is split into defensive players and attack-minded players – exclusively No 6s and No 10s in current parlance, with zero No 8s – means that without a individual to step between lines there is a danger of predictability; once more, Chelsea had the perfect player to fill that role, David Luiz frequently advancing forward from the defense to act as an additional midfield option.

Contrasting Styles at Palace and United

Crystal Palace aren’t concerned about possession. They have the second-lowest possession of all side in the Premier League. It’s not at all their job to have the possession. And that is the primary reason why a straightforward contrast with Manchester United’s struggles is challenging. The Red Devils, by history and by expectation, cannot be the team with the second-worst possession in the Premier League.

Even if United opted to play on the break against other top sides, most of their games will be against rivals who sit deep and could be content enough with a tie. In most fixtures there is an onus on them to dominate the play.

Maybe a progressive team can adopt a three-at-the-back system but it requires extremely specific players – as Conte possessed at Stamford Bridge. The Austrian’s success with it has come at Wolfsburg and Eintracht Frankfurt, where he has been able to have his side defend compactly and attack at speed.

Palace have defeated Aston Villa and West Ham, because most teams do at the moment, held Chelsea, and ripped Liverpool apart on the break. But they’ve additionally drawn at home to Nottingham Forest and Sunderland, and found it hard to overcome the Norwegian side. Sit deep against them and they struggle for invention.

Adjustment and Prospective Possibilities

Would Glasner adjust if he moved